This parable has
always fascinated me. It is very hard to understand – is Jesus
commending dishonesty? Is he recommending that we be as cunning in
our faith as crooked buisnessmen? Hundreds of different
interpretations over the centuries have sought to get Jesus off the
hook of praising sin, and yet we’re left rather confused. All sorts
of questions fly out at us. Who is doing the praising? Jesus or the
rich man? If it is Jesus, what it is he approves of here? Deceit?
Surely not. The sacked manager’s cleverness or determination?
Partly, it would seem. The self interest? That appears to be in his
mind too. And then on the other hand, if the boss is the one doing
the praising, why would he praise a steward who was being sacked for
bad management in the first place, when he is now standing to lose
money? Was it honour among thieves? Or, again, is it the cleverness,
the shrewdness that is being praised?
Partly it depends on
how we understand the story in the first place. Some people think
that the sacked man was overcharging and so, when he knew he was to
be dismissed, he was forgoing his cut to gain acceptance among his
former clients. Or its been suggested that he setting up a situation
which would enhance his master’s reputation as well as his own –
hoping to make his master look generous and so by a public relations
coup hoping to regain his job? Or maybe the amount he reduced each
bill by was the disguised interest his master was charging on his
debts, so he gains the moral high ground and the master can do
nothing about it because charging usury was illegal in the first
place.
Perhaps that is all
there is to it: a rather confusing little story that simply means, be
clever. But its also been suggested that this may been a story that
was circulating at the time, which Jesus then picked and used for his
own ends.
I think the key to
understanding this parable as more than simple advice is to turn the
focus from us – who are we in this story? To Jesus – where is
Jesus in this story?
Debt was used more
than once by Jesus as a metaphor for sins and forgiving debts, for
forgiving sins. Jesus uses the imagery in the Lord’s Prayer, and in
other parables. For example, earlier in Luke’s gospel we are told
the story of a woman pouring perfume on Jesus’s feet, and wiping
them with her hair. Jesus’s host, a pharisee, was horrified and
thought to himself ‘if this man really was a prophet, surely he
would know what kind of a woman this is, that she is a sinner?’.
Jesus knew what he was thinking, and told him a parable of two
debtors, one who owed five hundred denarii, the other fifty. Both
debts were written off by the creditor, and the one who owed more was
more grateful. Jesus then said to the woman, ‘your sins are
forgiven’ , to the consternation of the other guests at the feast.
Central to the
parable of the unjust steward is the fact that the rogue had no
authorisation to go around cancelling or cutting people’s debts. It
was outrageous behaviour. But Luke has just been telling us, for the
whole of the previous two chapters, that Jesus’ behaviour was
outrageous. His opponents were saying he had no right to go about
welcoming sinners and declaring God’s forgiveness to them. Jesus
was a rogue in the system. The scribes, and the pharisees, and other
religious authorities denied his authority to do what he did. They
criticised the company he hung out with, and they criticised his
failure to conform to the moral standards of the day. It was in
answer to these criticsms that Jesus told the previous parables, the
stories of the lost sheep and the lost coin that we heard last week,
and the story of the prodigal son that is between them and this story
in Luke. In all those stories, Jesus makes the point that God is more
concerned with finding the lost than simply keeping the righteous. He
told those stories specifically to defend himself against the
pharisees criticisms that he was spending time with those deemed to
be sinners and inappropriate company for a rabbi. In the context of
those stories, it seems likely that this parable too is telling us
something about God and his relationship with us, rather than simply
offering some rather odd advice.
It seems very likely
that Jesus has taken up a popular story about a rogue manager and
used it in self defence and to confront his opponents. He’s telling
this story against himself, and what a bold stroke! Suddenly the
whole difficult, complicated, immoral story untwists itself if , we
think of Jesus as likening himself to the unjust steward. Jesus is
the one whom his opponents were accusing of being a bad steward of
God’s holy things, and being unauthorised to forgive debts, but, he
asserts, he does so with God’s approval. As the master praised the
sacked manager, so, claims Jesus, God will approve his ministry and
his radical generosity. Jesus is the legitimate agent. And God is
that generous!
Jesus often used
stories from the commercial world, including those which likened God
or himself to rather shady characters – in other parables he used
the images of an unjust judge or a ruthless king, for example. And if
we think back to the parables of the previous chapter of Luke, such
as the lost sheep and the prodigal son, it is easy to see the
similarities. We are used to thinking of these stories as
illustrating God’s goodness, but in the context of the time they
were told, and especially in the context of the pharisees disapproval
of Jesus, they show God as good, yes, but to an almost irresponsible
degree. The parable of the lost sheep could be called the parable of
the irresponsible shepherd – what sort of shepherd abandons 99
sheep to bandits or wolves, to search for one lost one which might
already be dead? And the story of the prodigal son has the father
showing a reckless generosity, which enrages the older brother. In
all these parables, Jesus is asserting the outrageous, reckless,
irresponsible nature of God’s grace. The parable of the unjust
steward is defiant in the face of the criticism that Jesus is
subverting normal values. He insists that normal wordly standards
can’t be simply transposed onto God, and you can’t simply expect
God to behave as a human being might be expected to in a situation.
Time and again in the gospels, Jesus uses parables to hammer home the
message that God is not like a normal debtor, insisting that we pay
what we owe, he forgives us freely and much more than we deserve. And
the corollary of that is that we should do the same.
The world of debts
and debtors was not fantasy for Jesus’ first hearers. While
applying the imagery of debt to a broader theme, Jesus was also
indicating that he knew what was going on in his world. He knew how
oppressive systems worked themselves out in his Galilee to drive
people from their land into unemployment and poverty. While it is
naïve to read into Jesus’ teaching our perceptions of the
complexities of economic exploitation, nevertheless the proclamation
of the kingdom was meant to be good news for these poor and bring
them blessing. How can you assert these things as God’s priorities
and not address what is going on?
All through the
gospels, and especially in Luke’s gospel, money and wealth and
exploitation come up again and again. For the past couple of months,
Sunday after Sunday, we’ve heard about treasure on earth, treasure
in heaven, inviting the poor not just our friends or useful contacts
to our parties, how we use our money, and debt. Wealth and
exploitation are not simply one more moral issue which Christians
need to address, but something quite central to the gospel. No one is
to be written off, because what people have held against others has
been written off by the roguery, the outrageous behaviour, of divine
grace.
The mathematics that
God uses is not like our arithmetic. A very traditional view of how
gods judge humans after death, common to many religions and world
views across different times and cultures, is that we are weighed in
the scales. You may have seen ancient Egyptian paintings of the soul
being weighed – the idea being that the good and the bad we have
done are weighed against each other, and the gods see which is more
significant. Jesus’s economic parables turn that idea on its head.
God is more likely to throw the scales across the room, and come
dancing forward to embrace us. God’s grace is ridiculous, unfair,
profligate – that’s why the pharisees were so annoyed by Jesus.
It is lavished on us, regardless of whether we deserve it. But time
and again, in parable after parable – the lost sheep, the prodigal
son, the unjust steward – Jesus continues to insist that like it or
not, that is what God’s grace is like.
What a wonderful reading of this parable. That's a God I want to know about! Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteThanks Miranda - I share Imogen's response and will probably use your notes (suitably credited) for my own sermon this week.
ReplyDeleteHi Miranda
ReplyDeleteCan I lift some of this (acknowledging the source!) for some teachers notes we are preparing please? And we need to talk about Labyrinths - have a problem... Kxxx
Of course you can Karenza!
DeleteGive me a ring re labyrinths.
I've been working on a model of Chaplain as Pastoral Entrepreneur - taking entrepreneurship theory quite seriously - daring to read it theologically - and came across "Effectuation" - four principles which together make a logic that is proven as preferred by expert entrepreneurs. The third principle is "Leverage Contingency" - when the unexpected happens, turn it into an opportunity - get every last drop out of it. I cross referenced this to Luke's parable of the unjust steward - the unexpected thing for him was that he got found out and fired - so he milked it for all it was worth. In his book on chaplaincy Tim Jenkins interprets contingency through the eyes of faithful vocation as 'providence'. So how ready are we to see God in the unexpected - and to milk it for all it's worth?
ReplyDelete