Friday, 27 September 2013
Women Bishops: Crest of a Wave
I should be in a really good mood. What a fantastic month it has been for those of us who have been immersed in advocacy for women's equality in the Church!
First, we heard that Helen-Ann Hartley has been elected as the next bishop in New Zealand. She will be the first woman ordained in the Church of England to become a bishop, even if it is still only possible the other side of the world.
Then, the Church in Wales - much nearer home - voted to open the episcopate to women. Even better, they voted to remove any statutory discrimination from the draft legislation.
Thirdly, the Church of Ireland announced that the first woman had been elected to be a bishop there.
And finally, for now at least, we have heard that the Church of South India has elected their first woman as a bishop, too.
Yet despite all this good news, I have been feeling strangely down this week. And I think they are connected.
All these announcements are bitter-sweet for us here in England, aren't they? Even if you don't think women should become bishops, I'm sure you can empathise with the mixed feelings such announcements have brought with them.
First, they bring back all the pain of last November's 'No'. Rather like remembering a bereavement all over again when you hear of another death, seeing all these wonderful announcements means we can't continue to compartmentalise that hurt and sense of rejection. I read my blog post from November again today, and yes - those feelings are still raw, just below the surface. We have of course been ignoring them, suppressing them, just getting on with the day to day work of being a priest or a laywoman in Christ's church. But they are still there, only lightly scabbed over, and this month they have been itching.
Secondly, I am mourning what might have been. If the vote had gone the other way, we would be close to hearing our own announcements now. The new bishop of Durham could have been a woman. The back log of bishop appointments could have become a wave of brilliant women whose gifts could have flooded in to the House of Bishops. Instead, we are gathering up the crumbs under the rich man's table: a few women are to be permitted to attend the House of Bishop's meetings. Tweets pour scorn on those doing so as 'silly women' accepting posts as 'pseudo bishops'. Though a more accurate reading of the situation might be that the bishops are begging them to attend, to make them look better and to make their meeting dynamics work better, and the women concerned are graciously accepting the invitation, choosing with great dignity and calm not to be insulted. Hats off to them.
Thirdly, all these appointments remind us again and again that nowhere else in the Anglican Communion has the admission of women to the episcopate been hedged about by conditions, restrictions, provisions for opponents or discriminatory regulations. Every other province that currently allows women to be bishops - whether or not they actually have any yet- has simple legislation. Yet the Church of England is still agonising over how and whether this can be done, and what complicated arrangements might be suitable for those who wish to reject women's ministry. We appear unable to simply follow the lead of our brothers and sisters around the world, in a huge variety of contexts - from Canada to the Sudan.
And of course, all these appointments have provoked once again the usual statements of disapproval from the usual suspects, forcing us to hear once again that women are unequal, women should be subordinate, women can't be what many of us are - priests, deacons, bishops, co-workers with God on equal terms with our male colleagues. The arguments are the same, the rhetoric is tired, and our wince is a familiar one.
So I just feel tired, and a bit down. I wish I could rejoice, but at least I've worked out why I'm not feeling as great as I thought I would be.
There is a wave cresting, but it seems to be taking an awfully long time to break on this shore.
Tuesday, 17 September 2013
Luke 16:1-13 The Parable of the Dishonest Steward
My sermon notes for St.Laurence Pittington this coming Sunday:
This parable has
always fascinated me. It is very hard to understand – is Jesus
commending dishonesty? Is he recommending that we be as cunning in
our faith as crooked buisnessmen? Hundreds of different
interpretations over the centuries have sought to get Jesus off the
hook of praising sin, and yet we’re left rather confused. All sorts
of questions fly out at us. Who is doing the praising? Jesus or the
rich man? If it is Jesus, what it is he approves of here? Deceit?
Surely not. The sacked manager’s cleverness or determination?
Partly, it would seem. The self interest? That appears to be in his
mind too. And then on the other hand, if the boss is the one doing
the praising, why would he praise a steward who was being sacked for
bad management in the first place, when he is now standing to lose
money? Was it honour among thieves? Or, again, is it the cleverness,
the shrewdness that is being praised?
Partly it depends on
how we understand the story in the first place. Some people think
that the sacked man was overcharging and so, when he knew he was to
be dismissed, he was forgoing his cut to gain acceptance among his
former clients. Or its been suggested that he setting up a situation
which would enhance his master’s reputation as well as his own –
hoping to make his master look generous and so by a public relations
coup hoping to regain his job? Or maybe the amount he reduced each
bill by was the disguised interest his master was charging on his
debts, so he gains the moral high ground and the master can do
nothing about it because charging usury was illegal in the first
place.
Perhaps that is all
there is to it: a rather confusing little story that simply means, be
clever. But its also been suggested that this may been a story that
was circulating at the time, which Jesus then picked and used for his
own ends.
I think the key to
understanding this parable as more than simple advice is to turn the
focus from us – who are we in this story? To Jesus – where is
Jesus in this story?
Debt was used more
than once by Jesus as a metaphor for sins and forgiving debts, for
forgiving sins. Jesus uses the imagery in the Lord’s Prayer, and in
other parables. For example, earlier in Luke’s gospel we are told
the story of a woman pouring perfume on Jesus’s feet, and wiping
them with her hair. Jesus’s host, a pharisee, was horrified and
thought to himself ‘if this man really was a prophet, surely he
would know what kind of a woman this is, that she is a sinner?’.
Jesus knew what he was thinking, and told him a parable of two
debtors, one who owed five hundred denarii, the other fifty. Both
debts were written off by the creditor, and the one who owed more was
more grateful. Jesus then said to the woman, ‘your sins are
forgiven’ , to the consternation of the other guests at the feast.
Central to the
parable of the unjust steward is the fact that the rogue had no
authorisation to go around cancelling or cutting people’s debts. It
was outrageous behaviour. But Luke has just been telling us, for the
whole of the previous two chapters, that Jesus’ behaviour was
outrageous. His opponents were saying he had no right to go about
welcoming sinners and declaring God’s forgiveness to them. Jesus
was a rogue in the system. The scribes, and the pharisees, and other
religious authorities denied his authority to do what he did. They
criticised the company he hung out with, and they criticised his
failure to conform to the moral standards of the day. It was in
answer to these criticsms that Jesus told the previous parables, the
stories of the lost sheep and the lost coin that we heard last week,
and the story of the prodigal son that is between them and this story
in Luke. In all those stories, Jesus makes the point that God is more
concerned with finding the lost than simply keeping the righteous. He
told those stories specifically to defend himself against the
pharisees criticisms that he was spending time with those deemed to
be sinners and inappropriate company for a rabbi. In the context of
those stories, it seems likely that this parable too is telling us
something about God and his relationship with us, rather than simply
offering some rather odd advice.
It seems very likely
that Jesus has taken up a popular story about a rogue manager and
used it in self defence and to confront his opponents. He’s telling
this story against himself, and what a bold stroke! Suddenly the
whole difficult, complicated, immoral story untwists itself if , we
think of Jesus as likening himself to the unjust steward. Jesus is
the one whom his opponents were accusing of being a bad steward of
God’s holy things, and being unauthorised to forgive debts, but, he
asserts, he does so with God’s approval. As the master praised the
sacked manager, so, claims Jesus, God will approve his ministry and
his radical generosity. Jesus is the legitimate agent. And God is
that generous!
Jesus often used
stories from the commercial world, including those which likened God
or himself to rather shady characters – in other parables he used
the images of an unjust judge or a ruthless king, for example. And if
we think back to the parables of the previous chapter of Luke, such
as the lost sheep and the prodigal son, it is easy to see the
similarities. We are used to thinking of these stories as
illustrating God’s goodness, but in the context of the time they
were told, and especially in the context of the pharisees disapproval
of Jesus, they show God as good, yes, but to an almost irresponsible
degree. The parable of the lost sheep could be called the parable of
the irresponsible shepherd – what sort of shepherd abandons 99
sheep to bandits or wolves, to search for one lost one which might
already be dead? And the story of the prodigal son has the father
showing a reckless generosity, which enrages the older brother. In
all these parables, Jesus is asserting the outrageous, reckless,
irresponsible nature of God’s grace. The parable of the unjust
steward is defiant in the face of the criticism that Jesus is
subverting normal values. He insists that normal wordly standards
can’t be simply transposed onto God, and you can’t simply expect
God to behave as a human being might be expected to in a situation.
Time and again in the gospels, Jesus uses parables to hammer home the
message that God is not like a normal debtor, insisting that we pay
what we owe, he forgives us freely and much more than we deserve. And
the corollary of that is that we should do the same.
The world of debts
and debtors was not fantasy for Jesus’ first hearers. While
applying the imagery of debt to a broader theme, Jesus was also
indicating that he knew what was going on in his world. He knew how
oppressive systems worked themselves out in his Galilee to drive
people from their land into unemployment and poverty. While it is
naïve to read into Jesus’ teaching our perceptions of the
complexities of economic exploitation, nevertheless the proclamation
of the kingdom was meant to be good news for these poor and bring
them blessing. How can you assert these things as God’s priorities
and not address what is going on?
All through the
gospels, and especially in Luke’s gospel, money and wealth and
exploitation come up again and again. For the past couple of months,
Sunday after Sunday, we’ve heard about treasure on earth, treasure
in heaven, inviting the poor not just our friends or useful contacts
to our parties, how we use our money, and debt. Wealth and
exploitation are not simply one more moral issue which Christians
need to address, but something quite central to the gospel. No one is
to be written off, because what people have held against others has
been written off by the roguery, the outrageous behaviour, of divine
grace.
The mathematics that
God uses is not like our arithmetic. A very traditional view of how
gods judge humans after death, common to many religions and world
views across different times and cultures, is that we are weighed in
the scales. You may have seen ancient Egyptian paintings of the soul
being weighed – the idea being that the good and the bad we have
done are weighed against each other, and the gods see which is more
significant. Jesus’s economic parables turn that idea on its head.
God is more likely to throw the scales across the room, and come
dancing forward to embrace us. God’s grace is ridiculous, unfair,
profligate – that’s why the pharisees were so annoyed by Jesus.
It is lavished on us, regardless of whether we deserve it. But time
and again, in parable after parable – the lost sheep, the prodigal
son, the unjust steward – Jesus continues to insist that like it or
not, that is what God’s grace is like.
Saturday, 14 September 2013
Advent Hymn
Suggested tune: In Christ Alone (or other 8888 tune).
Update: Since blogging this, Chris Upton has composed a lovely new tune specifically for this hymn, Advent Hope, as he explains in the comments below. You can find it online here, at the CPDL free choral sheet music site.
This hymn is structured around the traditional candles of the Advent Wreath, and would work particularly well sung at the lighting of the candles. Either the verse for the week can be sung between the first and last verses, or the verses could be sung cumulatively through Advent. The hymn can also, of course, be sung as a whole, and this would be particularly appropriate on Advent Sunday, or at an Advent carol service.
First Verse:
In Advent hope, we watch for Christ,
Eagerly waiting for his birth.
Preparing hearts, our minds and lives,
Anticipating his return.
Watching for light, watching for love,
Watching for joy, watching for peace.
We'll see him soon, in life or death,
God with us then for evermore.
God with us then for evermore.
Advent 1:
In ages past the ancients told
Stories of what God promises:
From Noah's dove, to Sarah's laugh,
Wrestling with God or counting stars.
Stories of light, stories of love,
Stories of joy, stories of peace.
Through exiled years of slavery
Stories of hope and faithfulness.
Stories of hope and faithfulness.
Advent 2:
Your prophets held before our eyes
Visions of how the world could be
When righteousness is redefined:
Visions of grace and jubilee.
Visions of light, visions of love,
Visions of joy, visions of peace:
A coming king, who'll rule to serve,
Visions of justice all will see.
Visions of justice all will see.
Advent 3:
John warned your people to prepare
Baptising all who turned from sin,
From selfishness, unfairness, greed:
Guiding your people to your path.
The path of light, the path of love,
The path of joy, the path of peace.
Guiding us to eternal life,
Calling us all to fruitfulness.
Calling us all to fruitfulness.
Advent 4:
With Mary's yes, God came to grow,
Curled in the darkness of her womb.
And Mary sang, rejoicingly,
Telling of God's eternal plan.
Singing of light, singing of love,
Singing of joy, singing of peace.
Of how God loves the poor and low,
Turning the kingdom upside down.
Turning the kingdom upside down.
Final verse:
Inspired by them*, and trusting God,
We wait in darkness for the dawn.
In eager hope, expectantly,
Longing for Christ, the morning star.
Longing for light, longing for love,
Longing for joy, longing for peace.
Impatient for the coming day,
Longing to meet Christ face to face.
Longing to meet Christ face to face.
[*NB: if only the verse for Advent 3 or Advent 4 has been used on a particular occasion, change 'them' to 'him' or 'her']
You are welcome to use these words freely, with attribution (Creative Commons Licence Share-Alike Licence). I hope they are useful!
Thursday, 29 August 2013
To change the world
For the last few days I have been in Dublin at the Anglo Nordic Baltic Theological Conference, on Education, Ethos and Social Transformation. The following is a reflection following that conference.
'We teach to change the world'
We preach to change the world,
We pray to change the world.
We live, move, breath to change the world.
'Your kingdom come,
Your will be done':
Let the world be changed.
Let it be energised,
Transformed,
Aligned with your vision
Magnetised
By stroking against you
Lit up, salted, savoured, sweetened.
We pray to change the world.
We preach, I priest, to change the world.
And the world changed.
And then the Church cried out
In pain, in anger.
Decrying change,
Urging return:
Condemning as new and ungodly
The ways of the world
That we have shaped,
prayed in,
Fought for, struggled for,
shed and sweated blood for.
Your kingdom come
Only in polished mahogany
and jewelled crowns?
Your will be done
Only if it be the same
yesterday, today and forever?
We preach, teach, pray, priest
To change the world.
Let the world be changed.
(The title is a quotation from Stephen Brookfield's book 'Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher')
Tuesday, 6 August 2013
Inheritance and Greed: a sermon
These are my sermon notes from Sunday 4th August:
Luke 12.13-21
Todays readings are about inheritance and greed. It is interesting that the two are put together- puts issues of what we have and what we want very deliberately in a long term context.
And I know these are things that we are asking ourselves about. Just in the last year I have had several conversations with parishioners about inheritance. To take a few examples:
I have been approached by someone who doesnt come to church, but lives in the parish, asking if they could name me as their executor as they didnt trust their children to fulfill their wishes for their estate to go to charity, and didnt want to pay a solicitor (I said no, so dont all ask!).
I have had a heated debate with a friend in church about the rights and wrongs of inheritance tax, and whether as Christians we should prioritise the hopes and security of our children over all the other things we could do with our money.
And both PCCs have debated and adopted a legacies policy, addressing some of the common concerns people have over leaving a legacy to the church in their wills.
What questions nag away at you about inheritance?
Perhaps they are issues about what will happen with your money when you die. Will there be enough left to fulfill your childrens expectations or hopes? How much should you leave to charity, and how much to family? Will there be enough to pay for a funeral? What impact if any will inheritance tax have on the value of your estate? Who can you trust to be your executors? If you haven't thought about these things, please can I encourage you to do so: I see many families after a death, and uncertainty about 'what they would have wanted' is a big worry, as are arguments about inheritance especially when someone dies without leaving a will.
Or perhaps you have questions about what will happen to your money before you die: will the pension be enough to pay for nursing home care if you need it? Will you have to sell your house to pay for care? Can you trust those who you might give power of attorney to, not to rip you off if you aren't able to take care of your own affairs any more? Will your family argue about your money?
Or perhaps your questions about inheritance refer to your own potential expectations. Who benefits from the wills of your parents, grandparents, siblings? How much might they leave you? Will it all go on nursing home fees or can you expect a nice lump sum to pay off the mortgage or help your children buy their first home at some point? What if they change their minds and leave it all to the cats home instead?
These might not seem like particularly religious questions, but interestingly Jesus in the gospels talks more about money than any other subject. Todays gospel reading is very firmly focused on worries and family conflicts about inheritance.
And of course in the last week or so the papers have been full of Archbishop Justin talking about credit unions and how best as a church we can help those both in our churches and our wider community who are struggling with issues of debt and credit.
I don't know very much about credit unions, but I have discovered that there is a local one based in Gilesgate and I have made contact with the co-ordinator and will be meeting with her in September. But I gather that one of the main things we can do that would help would be to invest some of any savings we may have with them, as they only work if there are enough investors to balance the would-be creditors.
What Jesus makes very clear in this story and others, is that what we do with our money is a religious issue. Justin, when he was Bishop of Durham, called it Theology in Numbers. What we do with our money reveals what we really believe, what our values really are. What we do with our money can change the world and our communities for the better, working with God to build his Kingdom here on earth: or not. And if not, it may well be actively involved in doing evil rather than simply not doing good. It may be funding unethical companies- arms manufacturers, pornography dealers - if we simply leave it in the bank. Remember that factory collapse in Bangladesh earlier this year? The clothes we choose to buy, if we don't think about what we are buying, are probably being made in unsafe conditions and effectively upholding modern day slavery. What we do with our money, now and after our deaths, is a gospel issue. You could even say, given how much Jesus spoke about money compared to other things, that it is the gospel issue.
But look at how today's gospel starts. Someone asks Jesus a question- 'tell my brother what to do!' And Jesus' reply is startling: 'Friend, who set me up to be judge over you?'. Now I don't know about you, but this isn't what I'd expect Jesus to say here. I rather tend to think of him as being set up as a judge over me. But he refuses that position.
And then what does he say? I first read this passage as 'don't be greedy', but that's not quite what he says. 'take care', he says. 'Be on your guard against all kinds of greed'. We know we are not meant to be greedy: Jesus tells us to be careful, to examine our motivations.
Jesus doesn't tell us what to do. He doesn't give us rules to follow about what we do with our money. How much easier it would be if he did, however challenging they might be! You can see the attraction of churches saying that everyone should give 10% of any earnings to God, for example: we might resent it as a rule, but at least we would know where we stand. And we could feel smug if we were doing it. But thats the great danger of rules and regulations: they encourage righteousness, smugness, guilt and hypocrisy, rather than encouraging responsibility, thoughtfulness, love and honesty.
'Jesus, tell us what we should do with our money' might be our prayer. But all too often I fear that we are even more like the man at the beginning of todays story, and what we are actually asking is 'Jesus, tell other people what they should do with their money'! Tell them to give us more of it. Tell them to spend it on things we approve of. Tell them to be more responsible so the welfare bill is lower and our taxes less taxing, or tell the government to spend more or less on the things we want more or less of.
But Jesus' reply remains, 'Friend, who set me up to be judge over you?' Instead of giving us simple rules to apply, he tells us to take care, be on your guard against greed. To examine our motivations, take responsibility for our own financial decisions. And in doing so, hear and reflect on the stories Jesus tells us about money: about life, and death, and jealousy, and excess, and greed, and investment and profit and eternity. To be aware of a bigger picture than our own comfort, our own families, our own church, our own lifetimes. To try to make our judgements in the light of something like a Gods eye view of the world, with a sense of Gods perspective of time and fairness and generosity.
Amen.
Luke 12.13-21
Todays readings are about inheritance and greed. It is interesting that the two are put together- puts issues of what we have and what we want very deliberately in a long term context.
And I know these are things that we are asking ourselves about. Just in the last year I have had several conversations with parishioners about inheritance. To take a few examples:
I have been approached by someone who doesnt come to church, but lives in the parish, asking if they could name me as their executor as they didnt trust their children to fulfill their wishes for their estate to go to charity, and didnt want to pay a solicitor (I said no, so dont all ask!).
I have had a heated debate with a friend in church about the rights and wrongs of inheritance tax, and whether as Christians we should prioritise the hopes and security of our children over all the other things we could do with our money.
And both PCCs have debated and adopted a legacies policy, addressing some of the common concerns people have over leaving a legacy to the church in their wills.
What questions nag away at you about inheritance?
Perhaps they are issues about what will happen with your money when you die. Will there be enough left to fulfill your childrens expectations or hopes? How much should you leave to charity, and how much to family? Will there be enough to pay for a funeral? What impact if any will inheritance tax have on the value of your estate? Who can you trust to be your executors? If you haven't thought about these things, please can I encourage you to do so: I see many families after a death, and uncertainty about 'what they would have wanted' is a big worry, as are arguments about inheritance especially when someone dies without leaving a will.
Or perhaps you have questions about what will happen to your money before you die: will the pension be enough to pay for nursing home care if you need it? Will you have to sell your house to pay for care? Can you trust those who you might give power of attorney to, not to rip you off if you aren't able to take care of your own affairs any more? Will your family argue about your money?
Or perhaps your questions about inheritance refer to your own potential expectations. Who benefits from the wills of your parents, grandparents, siblings? How much might they leave you? Will it all go on nursing home fees or can you expect a nice lump sum to pay off the mortgage or help your children buy their first home at some point? What if they change their minds and leave it all to the cats home instead?
These might not seem like particularly religious questions, but interestingly Jesus in the gospels talks more about money than any other subject. Todays gospel reading is very firmly focused on worries and family conflicts about inheritance.
And of course in the last week or so the papers have been full of Archbishop Justin talking about credit unions and how best as a church we can help those both in our churches and our wider community who are struggling with issues of debt and credit.
I don't know very much about credit unions, but I have discovered that there is a local one based in Gilesgate and I have made contact with the co-ordinator and will be meeting with her in September. But I gather that one of the main things we can do that would help would be to invest some of any savings we may have with them, as they only work if there are enough investors to balance the would-be creditors.
What Jesus makes very clear in this story and others, is that what we do with our money is a religious issue. Justin, when he was Bishop of Durham, called it Theology in Numbers. What we do with our money reveals what we really believe, what our values really are. What we do with our money can change the world and our communities for the better, working with God to build his Kingdom here on earth: or not. And if not, it may well be actively involved in doing evil rather than simply not doing good. It may be funding unethical companies- arms manufacturers, pornography dealers - if we simply leave it in the bank. Remember that factory collapse in Bangladesh earlier this year? The clothes we choose to buy, if we don't think about what we are buying, are probably being made in unsafe conditions and effectively upholding modern day slavery. What we do with our money, now and after our deaths, is a gospel issue. You could even say, given how much Jesus spoke about money compared to other things, that it is the gospel issue.
But look at how today's gospel starts. Someone asks Jesus a question- 'tell my brother what to do!' And Jesus' reply is startling: 'Friend, who set me up to be judge over you?'. Now I don't know about you, but this isn't what I'd expect Jesus to say here. I rather tend to think of him as being set up as a judge over me. But he refuses that position.
And then what does he say? I first read this passage as 'don't be greedy', but that's not quite what he says. 'take care', he says. 'Be on your guard against all kinds of greed'. We know we are not meant to be greedy: Jesus tells us to be careful, to examine our motivations.
Jesus doesn't tell us what to do. He doesn't give us rules to follow about what we do with our money. How much easier it would be if he did, however challenging they might be! You can see the attraction of churches saying that everyone should give 10% of any earnings to God, for example: we might resent it as a rule, but at least we would know where we stand. And we could feel smug if we were doing it. But thats the great danger of rules and regulations: they encourage righteousness, smugness, guilt and hypocrisy, rather than encouraging responsibility, thoughtfulness, love and honesty.
'Jesus, tell us what we should do with our money' might be our prayer. But all too often I fear that we are even more like the man at the beginning of todays story, and what we are actually asking is 'Jesus, tell other people what they should do with their money'! Tell them to give us more of it. Tell them to spend it on things we approve of. Tell them to be more responsible so the welfare bill is lower and our taxes less taxing, or tell the government to spend more or less on the things we want more or less of.
But Jesus' reply remains, 'Friend, who set me up to be judge over you?' Instead of giving us simple rules to apply, he tells us to take care, be on your guard against greed. To examine our motivations, take responsibility for our own financial decisions. And in doing so, hear and reflect on the stories Jesus tells us about money: about life, and death, and jealousy, and excess, and greed, and investment and profit and eternity. To be aware of a bigger picture than our own comfort, our own families, our own church, our own lifetimes. To try to make our judgements in the light of something like a Gods eye view of the world, with a sense of Gods perspective of time and fairness and generosity.
Amen.
Monday, 5 August 2013
Wedding Hymn
So, a twitter friend, @artsyhonker, is getting married; and being a church organist has chosen her hymn tunes first and was struggling to find suitable words for one of them!
I love a challenge, so I had a go. The tune is 'Cornwall' (886 886): you can hear it here.
(this post has been edited 6th Aug, to add my thoughts and to change the text of the hymn a bit: thanks to Kathryn and Paul for comments).
My main inspiration - apart from having to fit that tune! - was the wedding service itself. It has always seemed odd to me that we don't have wedding hymns that celebrate the amazing vows that are being made. So as much as possible I have quoted from the wedding service. The first line, 'Unending love and faithfulness' is from the blessing of the rings: it fit the meter perfectly, so I knew I wanted it in there.
'All that I am I give to you, all that I have I share with you' is part of the words the couple say to each other at the exchange of the rings, and has always seemed to me to be the most amazing words any one can promise to another person.
The second verse begins a version of the sentence that opens the wedding service, 'God is love, and those who live in love live in God, and God lives in them'. Apart from being a lovely phrase, it seems particularly helpful and appropriate for use in a context where many at least of the guests, and often one or more of the couple, are a little agnostic about their faith: it helpfully explains God in terms of the love that everyone is there to celebrate, and assures everyone that they can speak of God in this context with a clear conscience.
I was also very conscious that, whilst this is a commissioned piece and I wanted it to be meaningful for the couple involved to sing, it needed to work sung by the whole congregation. So places where it uses 'our' are deliberately slightly ambiguous, referring both to the couple and to the congregation. And the direct quote from the vows is in inverted commas.
Finally, I was conscious at the back of my mind that I wanted to make sure this could be sung at a same sex commitment ceremony (and indeed by feminists!), so I wanted to focus on celebrating the quality of commitment rather than any particular baggage about what marriage has meant historically.
I don't think this is particularly brilliant poetry, if I'm honest, but it does work better sung to the tune (try it!).
I really enjoyed the challenge...and am inspired to try to write more hymn words for places where the canon seems to have gaps!
Unending love and faithfulness
We sing with heartfelt thankfulness
And celebrate today;
“All that I am I give to you
All that I have I share with you”:
These vows fill us with awe.
I love a challenge, so I had a go. The tune is 'Cornwall' (886 886): you can hear it here.
(this post has been edited 6th Aug, to add my thoughts and to change the text of the hymn a bit: thanks to Kathryn and Paul for comments).
My main inspiration - apart from having to fit that tune! - was the wedding service itself. It has always seemed odd to me that we don't have wedding hymns that celebrate the amazing vows that are being made. So as much as possible I have quoted from the wedding service. The first line, 'Unending love and faithfulness' is from the blessing of the rings: it fit the meter perfectly, so I knew I wanted it in there.
'All that I am I give to you, all that I have I share with you' is part of the words the couple say to each other at the exchange of the rings, and has always seemed to me to be the most amazing words any one can promise to another person.
The second verse begins a version of the sentence that opens the wedding service, 'God is love, and those who live in love live in God, and God lives in them'. Apart from being a lovely phrase, it seems particularly helpful and appropriate for use in a context where many at least of the guests, and often one or more of the couple, are a little agnostic about their faith: it helpfully explains God in terms of the love that everyone is there to celebrate, and assures everyone that they can speak of God in this context with a clear conscience.
I was also very conscious that, whilst this is a commissioned piece and I wanted it to be meaningful for the couple involved to sing, it needed to work sung by the whole congregation. So places where it uses 'our' are deliberately slightly ambiguous, referring both to the couple and to the congregation. And the direct quote from the vows is in inverted commas.
Finally, I was conscious at the back of my mind that I wanted to make sure this could be sung at a same sex commitment ceremony (and indeed by feminists!), so I wanted to focus on celebrating the quality of commitment rather than any particular baggage about what marriage has meant historically.
I don't think this is particularly brilliant poetry, if I'm honest, but it does work better sung to the tune (try it!).
I really enjoyed the challenge...and am inspired to try to write more hymn words for places where the canon seems to have gaps!
Unending love and faithfulness
We sing with heartfelt thankfulness
And celebrate today;
Commitment, comfort, honour, joy
Our hearts and minds and tongues
employ
And may our lives display.
For God is love: living in love
We live in God, and God above
Our hearts and lives enfolds.
Family and friends to share our bliss (NB, 'Family' needs to be sung 'Fam'ly'!)
Our joy, our heaven on earth is this (Acknowledgement: this line is from Wesley)
All love this love upholds.
All that I have I share with you”:
These vows fill us with awe.
This promise will be our delight
Our inspiration day and night
From this day evermore.
You're welcome to use these words if you would like to under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported licence.
Friday, 26 July 2013
The Lord's Prayer: Sermon for July 28th
These are my sermon notes for Sunday. If you come along to St. Mary Magdalene, Belmont you will hear a different version of this depending on whether you are at the 8am BCP communion, the 10.30 All Age with Baptism, or the 12.30 Baptism service...but these are the notes for all of them.
If you are also following the Teenage prayer experiment blog then you may recognise some of the material!
Gospel Reading: Luke 11:1-13
11Jesus was praying in a certain place, and after he had finished,
one of his disciples said to him, “Lord, teach us to pray, as John
taught his disciples.” 2He said to them, “When you
pray, say: Father, hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come. 3Give
us each day our daily bread. 4And forgive us our sins, for
we ourselves forgive everyone indebted to us. And do not bring us to
the time of trial.” 5And he said to them, “Suppose one
of you has a friend, and you go to him at midnight and say to him,
‘Friend, lend me three loaves of bread; 6for a friend of
mine has arrived, and I have nothing to set before him.’ 7And
he answers from within, ‘Do not bother me; the door has already
been locked, and my children are with me in bed; I cannot get up and
give you anything.’ 8I tell you, even though he will not
get up and give him anything because he is his friend, at least
because of his persistence he will get up and give him whatever he
needs. 9“So I say to you, Ask, and it will be given you;
search, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened for
you. 10For everyone who asks receives, and everyone who
searches finds, and for everyone who knocks, the door will be opened.
11Is there anyone among you who, if your child asks for a
fish, will give a snake instead of a fish? 12Or if the
child asks for an egg, will give a scorpion? 13If you
then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how
much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who
ask him!”Sermon Outline:
- Being in bed and not wanting to get up to answer demands for
a drink of water or a story or a lost teddy is something all parents
– indeed, all grandparents and anyone who has ever stayed in a
house with small children - know well!
- When people asked Jesus to teach them to pray, he taught them
the short form of prayer that we now call 'The Lord's
Prayer'.
There are slightly different versions of it in different accounts - the one in our reading today is the shortest - but they all are similar.
- And they all begin in a way that was revolutionary at the
time; by calling God, ‘Father’. This sounds quite formal to us,
but the original word, ‘Abba’, is very informal, more like
‘daddy’. This was a huge contrast to how people were used to
talking to and about God – as YHWH, THE LORD! Jesus was
introducing people to the amazing idea that God is someone with whom
we can have a personal, emotional, individual relationship.
- Its a lovely touch to follow this, in this story, with the
image of a dad not wanting to get out of bed! It brings it right
down to earth, doesn’t it? We may not want to get up and help,
when that little voices pipes up 'Da -ddy? Mu-mmy?' in the middle of
the night. But if we are pestered enough we will drag ourselves out
of bed and deal with the problem so we can all get back to sleep.
- And Jesus uses this example to say to us: look, God really
does hear and answer prayers. Even if you don’t think your worries
or problems are important enough for God, even if you find it hard
to believe that God loves you, just think about how you end up doing
something for your kids when they pester you enough: even if it were
true that God thought your complaint quite trivial, he would still
answer it!
- Its important to note that Jesus and the Church are not
saying that God is exactly like a dad. We all probably have mixed
feelings about our parents, and about our own parenting ability. But
Jesus knows that and his image here has a wonderful realism about
it. ‘If you then, who are evil, know how to give good gifts to
your children, how much more will the heavenly Father give the Holy
Spirit to those who ask!’. God knows that our earthly images of
parenting are often lazy, angry, unreliable or impatient as least as
often as they are close, loving and reliable. Unless we’ve had a
very bad experience of parenting – when you might think ‘actually
you know what, my dad is exactly the kind of person who if you asked
for a fish would think it was funny to give you a snake’ - most
would agree that yes, for all their faults, our parents did broadly
speaking know how to feed us reasonably healthily most of the time.
- So, Jesus says, if even we, who know we aren’t perfect
parents, get some things right, how much more can we rely on God to
look after us. Even the best parenting is only a pale approximation
to God’s infinite and total care for us.
- So what else does Jesus
reckon we should say when we pray? Well, the next phrase he gives us
here is Hallowed be your name. Again,
this may sound fairly formal, but it just means God, we pray that
everyone may call you holy. So we are starting off by
recognising that God is close and personal – our Father – but
also totally holy.
- Your kingdom come is the next thing we ask. Jesus's
main message when he was talking to people was about God's kingdom
coming. But he didn't seem to mean a normal kind of kingdom. He
didn’t mean he was going to take over and rule the world like the
kings and presidents of our countries. This seems to be a prayer for
the world to be a better place, a place where everyone is valued
equally. What do you think would make the world a better place, more
like the world Jesus taught us to hope for? What would be different
about life in God's kingdom?
- Give us today our daily bread This line means we are
asking God for what we need, and as in the story Jesus told about
the dad in bed, we trust that God will hear us and give us what we
need. But the word ‘daily’ is interesting. It means we are not
expecting God to give us everything we would like. We are only
asking for enough for today. So we are trusting God one day at a
time, and trying not to worry too much about the future.
- And forgive us our sins We might not feel we have
'sins', as it sounds quite heavy and serious: or we might think this
just means eating too many icecreams! But Jesus included these words
for everyone. Asking God to forgive us our sins, all that we do
wrong, means admitting that we are not perfect. We can feel safe to
admit that, because Jesus promises that nothing we can do or be can
stop God loving us and hearing and answering our prayers.
- As we forgive those who sin against us, or are indebted to
us. This can be the most difficult bit! If we can trust God to
love us whatever we do, can we bring ourselves to forgive people who
have been horrible to us? If you are angry with someone, it can feel
like letting them off if you choose to stop being angry. Forgiving
doesn’t mean forgetting: it doesn’t stop us knowing what has
happened in the past, and being sensible about our future actions.
It doesn’t mean we have to trust someone who has let us down many
times in the past. But Christians believe - and scientists agree -
that choosing not to hold on to anger makes you a happier and
healthier person. So here we ask God to help us not to hold onto
resentment and bitterness for all the things that seem so unfair in
life, but to let them go and free ourselves for the future.
- And do not bring us to the time of trial; or in the better
known version, Deliver us from evil. This line is a catch-all
prayer asking for protection from bad or scary things. From illness,
people dying, people wanting to hurt us, anything we are worried or
anxious about. In this line we are praying that those things never
happen to us. There’s a famous echo of this line too in Google’s
slogan – ‘Don’t be evil’. I wonder if this line maybe also
asking for God to help not to be evil to other people?
What is not known is how Jesus meant these words to be used. Did he mean 'say exactly these words'? Or did he mean 'include these areas when you pray'. We don't know, but many Christians do both. Saying the Lord's prayer is a good way to start or end prayers, and if you go to church it will usually be said in every service.
It is a good prayer to use if you can't think of anything to say, or you don't think you know how to pray, or don't know what to pray for. Just use these words, and you know you are doing what Jesus taught his first followers to do.
- So let us pray, in the words that Jesus taught us:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)